Herbicides

New U.S. Geological Survey-led research suggests that even though amphibians are severely declining worldwide, there is no smoking gun -- and thus no simple solution -- to halting or reversing these declines. "Implementing conservation plans at a local level will be key in stopping amphibian population losses, since global efforts to reduce or lessen threats have been elusive," said Evan Grant, a USGS research wildlife biologist who led the study published in Scientific Reports today.

Western pond turtles in Sequoia National Park and other California remote wildlands have been exposed to an assortment of agricultural and industrial contaminants, according to a study from the National Park Service and the University of California, Davis. In the study, published online in the journal Chemosphere, scientists sampled for 57 compounds, including pesticides, in turtles, invertebrates, and sediments from three sites: Sequoia National Park, Whiskeytown National Recreation Area, and Six Rivers National Forest.

"Kids are on the frontline in Minnesota," the Pesticide Action Network warns in a recently released report on the effects of children's exposure to pesticides. "Kids are more vulnerable to chemical exposure," Lex Horan of the Pesticide Action Network told a Park Rapids area audience this week. "They haven't developed the biological defense mechanisms. When kids are exposed at a critical moment of development it can have a lifelong effect." The report's review of government health trend data and recent academic research found:

Bei der Bewertung von Pestiziden liefert ein einfaches Modell sicherere Ergebnisse als das aktuell von der EU angewandte. Das belegt eine aktuelle Studie des Instituts für Umweltwissenschaften der Universität Koblenz-Landau und der ETH Zürich. Die Wissenschaftler zeigen, dass zur Risikobewertung von Pestiziden ein weitaus weniger komplexes Box-Modell eine höhere Sicherheit für die Umwelt bieten kann als der von der EU verwendete FOCUS-Modellierungsansatz.

A disturbing analysis of how the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) managed to infiltrate and influence EFSA (European Food Safety Agency) and a wide range of other international regulatory bodies concerned with pesticides, chemicals, food safety and drug safety. ILSI goes to great lengths to present itself as a non-lobbying group, but it is quite clear from its membership, actions and funding sources that it is an extremely focused lobbying group.

European Union countries on Thursday again delayed a vote on whether to renew the sales authorization of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto Co.’s popular weedkiller Roundup, amid conflicting scientific assessments on whether the substance causes cancer in humans. “Since it was obvious that no qualified majority would have been reached, a vote was not held,” said a spokeswoman for the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm. The commission had proposed to reauthorize glyphosate for nine years once its current sales license runs out on June 30.

Scientists have sounded the alarm that high concentrations of pesticides are showing up in urine samples of Danish mothers and children. Researchers suspect that the pesticides harm children’s brains. “It is alarming that we have such a high concentration of pesticides in Denmark,” Philippe Grandjean, a professor of environmental medicine and head of research at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), told Altinget.

Der Vorsitzende und Ko-Vorsitzende einer Arbeitsgruppe der FAO und WHO zu Pestiziden, die am Montag Glyphosat für unbedenklich erklärt hatte, sind nach Recherchen des britischen Guardian massiv in Interessenskonflikte verstrickt. Professor Alan Boobis, der Vorsitzende des Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR), ist gleichzeitig Vize-Präsident des International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Europe.